{"id":7331,"date":"2020-07-08T15:59:00","date_gmt":"2020-07-08T19:59:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americancompass.beckandstone.com\/?p=7331"},"modified":"2022-11-07T22:43:29","modified_gmt":"2022-11-08T03:43:29","slug":"obligations-yes-but-secondary-ones","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/obligations-yes-but-secondary-ones\/","title":{"rendered":"Obligations, Yes, But Secondary Ones"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
The Corporate Obligations Debate: Home<\/a><\/h6>\n\n\n\n

I want to thank my friend Oren Cass and the team at American Compass for the opportunity to discuss how corporate businesses should balance shareholder interests with their obligations to their workers, communities, and nation. It is particularly an honor to discuss this topic with an academic as esteemed as Patrick Deneen. I\u2019m hopeful that the profound difference in our perspectives can lead to constructive discussion and action going forward.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As a former corporate attorney and CEO, I view corporations somewhat differently than Patrick. There is certainly a sense in which, as Patrick notes, modern corporations are a \u201cbody or collectivity of people.\u201d There are, of course, various corporate purposes that bring people together. They can be charitable, educational, religious, or commercial.  I\u2019ll limit the scope of my comments to corporations that are profit-oriented.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

No discussion of this topic would be complete without at least a reference to Milton Friedman\u2019s belief<\/a> that a business\u2019s only social responsibility is to \u201cuse its resources and engage in activities designed to improve its profits.\u201d If we are going to discuss assigning other responsibilities to corporations, it\u2019s important to examine why the law recognizes the corporate form in the first place\u2014why we have a business structure that exists apart from its owners and how society benefits from that structure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Why<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Corporate ownership exists primarily to facilitate investment. It permits people to start a business, invest in it by purchasing stock, and limit their personal liability to the loss of that investment. Assuming shareholders and management abide by the law and respect the corporate formalities, the corporate entity shields investors from liability for the broader obligations of the business\u2014such as debts or lawsuits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This structure provides tremendous societal and economic benefit by encouraging people to start, invest in, and grow businesses. Faced with high levels of risk, people tend to put their money under the mattress, so to speak. If we limit investor exposure to the known risks of business success or failure, they are more likely to invest. There are other similar concepts such as limited partnerships and limited liability companies, but the corporation remains the primary risk-limiting vehicle for business formation and growth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Every entrepreneur and businessperson understands the critical importance of raising capital to start a business or grow an existing business. Capital is the life blood of any business enterprise. Capital investment relieves entrepreneurs of the burden of either personally financing the business or the obligations of loan repayment\u2014assuming a young or troubled business could get a loan. You do give up at least a portion of your equity in the business, but you can raise capital and grow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This corporate structure has been overwhelmingly successful in generating investment, broad-based economic growth, and prosperity. There is a reason virtually every country, and certainly every prosperous country, recognizes and encourages the corporate structure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Because capital investment is a critical component of economic prosperity, the next question is: why do people invest in a business?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The answer is profit. The greater the potential for profit, the greater the attraction of investment and the greater the associated economic growth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s good to keep in mind that, in free-market economies, businesses profit only by meeting the needs of others. Capitalism encourages people to improve their own lives by providing the products or services that other people want at a price they can afford. In this sense, businesses striving for profit benefits society as a whole.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Henry Ford built cars for the common man, not kings, queens, or nobility.  Steve Jobs created iPhones for all of us, not government elites. Jeff Bezos didn\u2019t become rich because he stole from us.  He became rich because he created the greatest distribution system in the history of the world \u2013 and we may all be grateful he did so before the pandemic. Each of these business endeavors had a corporate structure financed by profit-motivated investors. Each of them immeasurably benefitted society in general.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And that\u2019s the biggest flaw in Patrick\u2019s argument.  He doesn\u2019t recognize the opportunity costs of trying to turn businesses into engines of social progress. If you impose non-economic obligations on corporations and thereby reduce their focus on profit, you reduce the incentive to invest and the capital available for dynamic growth. What that means for the broader community is fewer jobs, poorer paying jobs, reduced innovation, fewer products for consumers and reduced prosperity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Patrick claims that the \u201cprivatistic conception\u201d of the modern corporation has caused \u201cwidespread social damage.\u201d The opposite is true; the corporation\u2019s focus on private sector profit has played a major role in lifting humankind from centuries of privation and misery to an era of unparalleled prosperity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Our economy works because corporations focus on generating profits. To the extent that we \u201creorient modern corporations toward the more embedded social positions,\u201d we place the benefits of a profit-driven model as risk. When the focus becomes what the government perceives as benefiting society at any given time (a moving target) rather than that which benefits investors at all times, we increase the risk of loss rather than the benefits of profit. People reduce or stop investing, the economy stagnates or declines, and workers lose jobs and opportunity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To be sure, corporations, like all businesses, are engines of economic<\/em> production, and people need more than just wealth.  That is why healthy societies have healthy families, strong religious organizations, flourishing arts, and other agencies through which people find love, moral clarity, inspiration, and emotional stability.  Businesses are not and cannot be the primary agents for meeting those needs.  But what they can and will do is generate the wealth that supports the rest of society \u2013 if the government allows the profit motive to do its work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Encouraging Long-Term Gains<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Certainly, no system or business model is perfect, and the corporate model is no exception. I\u2019ll look now at a few of Patrick\u2019s specific suggestions for corporate reform.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I agree with him that management should be encouraged to \u201cpursue long-term gains through slow, but organic growth rather than ginned up returns that inflate stock prices.\u201d But a lack of corporate responsibility isn\u2019t the cause of this problem.  The cause is quarterly reporting of financial results.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To avoid the evils of insider trading, the Security Exchange Act of 1934 instituted the quarterly reporting system still required for public companies today. As corporate performance is judged every three months, the system motivates decision-making based on what’s best for the company this quarter, rather than what’s best over the longer term.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Privately held corporations, such as those owned by individual entrepreneurs or private equity firms, do not face this issue as they do not publicly report their data. They are free to focus on longer-term value creation, which is a core element of private equity\u2019s success.  That is why, as a CEO, I opted to take my company private; I wanted time to fix the structural issues facing the business and prepare it for success in the long term<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Much of this problem could be eliminated if management didn\u2019t have to publicly report financial results every ninety days. I support this change, and President Trump has asked<\/a> the SEC to study the issue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Obligations to Employees<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

I disagree with Patrick\u2019s comment that the modern corporation views an employee as \u201can individual who contracts individually for a set income \u2013 end of story.\u201d That was not my experience, nor does it make economic sense.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Employees are every business\u2019s most important asset. You simply cannot succeed without a loyal and efficient workforce.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As such, businesses must compete for employees.  This was particularly true during the two years prior to the COVID-19 pandemic when there were consistently more job openings than people unemployed. <\/em>Yearly wages rose consistently over 3% for the first time in a decade\u2014and for twenty consecutive months\u2014until the pandemic hit our shores. Wages and benefits increased organically and sustainably, particularly for blue-collar workers \u2013 because corporations wanted to make a profit.  <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bargaining collectively is a right in the US and has been for decades. However, private sector union membership has declined steadily from 35% in the 1950s to 6.2%<\/a> in 2019. Perhaps employees are more happy with their employers than some would have us believe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Aligning workers\u2019 interests with employers through, for example, stock-ownership plans, is a great idea and something that I have long supported. Employee stock ownership motivates workers to think in terms of the overall health and profitability of the business. That\u2019s a positive for everyone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Shareholders & Investors<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

With respect to shareholders, Patrick distinguishes between \u201cowners\u201d of publicly traded companies who are \u201cactually <\/em>investors\u201d and speculators who lead to \u201cfinancial chicanery and ill-considered corporate acquiring, re-ordering, and divesting.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But businesses that engage in \u201cill-considered\u201d acquisitions and divestitures or financial deception become unprofitable and go out of business.  No profit-oriented manager or investor wants that result\u2014either over the long or short term.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Discouraging speculation, as Patrick suggests, through \u201cpunitive taxation\u201d of short- and medium-term capital gains might slow \u201cspeculation,\u201d but it would also tie up capital that could be more efficiently invested in the broader economy and drive economic growth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Customers & Community<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

I\u2019m going to deal with customers and community together because they are increasingly related.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As I noted above, success in a capitalist economy means meeting the needs of others\u2014namely customers. The key is figuring out what those needs are. As Patrick notes, there is a growing desire among consumers to buy from companies that are socially responsible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Customers\u2019 desires play an important role in management decisions on all issues. Obviously, businesses succeed and increase their profits by increasing sales. If being socially responsible increases sales, it is in the best interests of management and investors alike to be socially responsible. That puts the consumer\u2014in other words, the free market\u2014in control.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Social responsibility is of particular concern to the millennial generation and they are an increasingly large part of our nation\u2019s consumer base. So, social responsibility is becoming increasingly important for businesses in all sectors. But unlike Patrick, I\u2019d much rather have customers, not the government, dictate how corporations should be \u201csocially responsible.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

My concern is with adding government mandates to the business equation. Meeting your customers\u2019 needs increases profitability and encourages investment. Being forced to meet what the government determines are appropriate social needs (a moving target at best) has the opposite effect, reducing profitability and the incentive to invest which are the hallmarks of the corporate structure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As such, I generally view increased government involvement, be it regulatory or statutory, as a negative that discourages growth. The free market is implementing changes in corporate culture consistent with customer demand and society\u2019s needs. Corporations are communities of investors, and they have enabled the greatest period of economic growth and prosperity in human history. When you strike at their ability to encourage investment, you strike at the very heart of that prosperity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Patrick is a learned and conscientious man. I suspect his desire for greater corporate responsibility arises out of a sense that our society, as a whole, has lost moral clarity and that corporate business has less respect than it should have for the ethical considerations that we both value as the hallmarks of a life well lived. I would agree with him on that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Where we disagree is that Patrick seems to think the problem is the capitalist system, or the corporate structure, whereas I think that the problem lies in the human heart and that it would exist regardless of the business model our society favored. My concern is that Patrick\u2019s proposed solutions would make America no better, but much poorer and that working and lower income Americans \u2013 people who come from the same background as I do \u2013 would suffer the most from what he wants to do.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Next entry: Patrick Deneen on Ordering Obligations for the Common Good<\/a><\/h6>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

How should businesses balance shareholder interests with obligations to their workers, communities, and nation?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":48,"featured_media":7327,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_tec_requires_first_save":true,"_price":"","_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_header":"","_tribe_default_ticket_provider":"","_tribe_ticket_capacity":"0","_ticket_start_date":"","_ticket_end_date":"","_tribe_ticket_show_description":"","_tribe_ticket_show_not_going":false,"_tribe_ticket_use_global_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_global_stock_level":"","_global_stock_mode":"","_global_stock_cap":"","_tribe_rsvp_for_event":"","_tribe_ticket_going_count":"","_tribe_ticket_not_going_count":"","_tribe_tickets_list":"[]","_tribe_ticket_has_attendee_info_fields":false,"_EventAllDay":false,"_EventTimezone":"","_EventStartDate":"","_EventEndDate":"","_EventStartDateUTC":"","_EventEndDateUTC":"","_EventShowMap":false,"_EventShowMapLink":false,"_EventURL":"","_EventCost":"","_EventCostDescription":"","_EventCurrencySymbol":"","_EventCurrencyCode":"","_EventCurrencyPosition":"","_EventDateTimeSeparator":"","_EventTimeRangeSeparator":"","_EventOrganizerID":[],"_EventVenueID":[],"_OrganizerEmail":"","_OrganizerPhone":"","_OrganizerWebsite":"","_VenueAddress":"","_VenueCity":"","_VenueCountry":"","_VenueProvince":"","_VenueState":"","_VenueZip":"","_VenuePhone":"","_VenueURL":"","_VenueStateProvince":"","_VenueLat":"","_VenueLng":"","_VenueShowMap":false,"_VenueShowMapLink":false,"_tribe_blocks_recurrence_rules":"","_tribe_blocks_recurrence_description":"","_tribe_blocks_recurrence_exclusions":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[33],"tags":[142,25],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nObligations, Yes, But Secondary Ones - American Compass<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"How should businesses balance shareholder interests with obligations to their workers, communities, and nation?\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/obligations-yes-but-secondary-ones\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Obligations, Yes, But Secondary Ones - American Compass\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"How should businesses balance shareholder interests with obligations to their workers, communities, and nation?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/obligations-yes-but-secondary-ones\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Compass\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/AmerCompass\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-07-08T19:59:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-11-08T03:43:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/boardroom_shuterstock.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2309\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1732\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Andy Puzder\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@AndyPuzder\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@AmerCompass\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Andy Puzder\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/obligations-yes-but-secondary-ones\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/obligations-yes-but-secondary-ones\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Andy Puzder\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b38aa221098518018e2da910bba8285c\"},\"headline\":\"Obligations, Yes, But Secondary Ones\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-08T19:59:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-11-08T03:43:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/obligations-yes-but-secondary-ones\/\"},\"wordCount\":2014,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Corporate Actual Responsibility\",\"Financialization\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Conversations\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/obligations-yes-but-secondary-ones\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/obligations-yes-but-secondary-ones\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/obligations-yes-but-secondary-ones\/\",\"name\":\"Obligations, Yes, But Secondary Ones - American Compass\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-08T19:59:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-11-08T03:43:29+00:00\",\"description\":\"How should businesses balance shareholder interests with obligations to their workers, communities, and nation?\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/obligations-yes-but-secondary-ones\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/\",\"name\":\"American Compass\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/#organization\",\"name\":\"American Compass\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/logo.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/logo.svg\",\"caption\":\"American Compass\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/AmerCompass\/\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/AmerCompass\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b38aa221098518018e2da910bba8285c\",\"name\":\"Andy Puzder\",\"description\":\"Andy Puzder is the former CEO of CKE Restaurants, Senior Fellow at the Pepperdine University School of Public Policy, and the author of The Trump Boom: America\u2019s Soaring Economy and the Left\u2019s Plot to Stop It.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/AndyPuzder\",\"americancomp\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Obligations, Yes, But Secondary Ones - American Compass","description":"How should businesses balance shareholder interests with obligations to their workers, communities, and nation?","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/obligations-yes-but-secondary-ones\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Obligations, Yes, But Secondary Ones - American Compass","og_description":"How should businesses balance shareholder interests with obligations to their workers, communities, and nation?","og_url":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/obligations-yes-but-secondary-ones\/","og_site_name":"American Compass","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/AmerCompass\/","article_published_time":"2020-07-08T19:59:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-11-08T03:43:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2309,"height":1732,"url":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/boardroom_shuterstock.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Andy Puzder","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@AndyPuzder","twitter_site":"@AmerCompass","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Andy Puzder","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/obligations-yes-but-secondary-ones\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/obligations-yes-but-secondary-ones\/"},"author":{"name":"Andy Puzder","@id":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b38aa221098518018e2da910bba8285c"},"headline":"Obligations, Yes, But Secondary Ones","datePublished":"2020-07-08T19:59:00+00:00","dateModified":"2022-11-08T03:43:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/obligations-yes-but-secondary-ones\/"},"wordCount":2014,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/#organization"},"keywords":["Corporate Actual Responsibility","Financialization"],"articleSection":["Conversations"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americancompass.org\/obligations-yes-but-secondary-ones\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/obligations-yes-but-secondary-ones\/","url":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/obligations-yes-but-secondary-ones\/","name":"Obligations, Yes, But Secondary Ones - American Compass","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-07-08T19:59:00+00:00","dateModified":"2022-11-08T03:43:29+00:00","description":"How should businesses balance shareholder interests with obligations to their workers, communities, and nation?","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americancompass.org\/obligations-yes-but-secondary-ones\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/","name":"American Compass","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/#organization","name":"American Compass","url":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/logo.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/logo.svg","caption":"American Compass"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/AmerCompass\/","https:\/\/twitter.com\/AmerCompass"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b38aa221098518018e2da910bba8285c","name":"Andy Puzder","description":"Andy Puzder is the former CEO of CKE Restaurants, Senior Fellow at the Pepperdine University School of Public Policy, and the author of The Trump Boom: America\u2019s Soaring Economy and the Left\u2019s Plot to Stop It.","sameAs":["https:\/\/twitter.com\/AndyPuzder","americancomp"]}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/boardroom_shuterstock.jpg","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7331"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/48"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7331"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7331\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9545,"href":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7331\/revisions\/9545"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7327"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7331"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7331"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americancompass.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7331"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}