Call it neopopulism: a bipartisan attitude that mistrusts the free-market ethos instead of embracing it.

RECOMMENDED READING

It may be the most discussed fact about American politics today: The country is deeply polarized. The Republican Party has moved to the right by many measures, and the Democratic Party has moved to the left. Each party sees the other as an existential threat. One consequence of this polarization, politicians and pundits often say, is gridlock in Washington.

But in a country that is supposed to have a gridlocked federal government, the past four years are hard to explain. These years have been arguably the most productive period of Washington bipartisanship in decades.

What other neopopulist policies might lie ahead? More legislation to address China’s rise and more industrial policy are possible. A bill to ensure that the United States has access to critical minerals like lithium and copper would qualify as both.

Policies to help young families are plausible, too, predicted Oren Cass, who runs American Compass, a conservative think tank that is critical of laissez-faire economics. In January, a large bipartisan House majority passed an expanded child tax credit, although it has not passed the Senate.

Continue reading in the New York Times
Recommended Reading
American Compass Releases Major New Collection on U.S. Trade Policy

“On Balance” charts a path from free trade orthodoxy to a results-oriented approach

Ideology Over Interest

How American trade policy was captured by free trade dogma

The Dollar Dilemma

Balanced trade is impossible without a fairly-valued dollar—and a better approach to international monetary policy