Supporting the indispensable institution
The family is the indispensable institution, the only one capable of producing a next generation and preparing it for the burdens of productive citizenship. Its ongoing collapse poses the greatest threat to American liberty and prosperity.
Beginning in the 1960s, a rising share of children have been born to single mothers and raised in unstable households. More recently, marriage and fertility rates have fallen to the point that more 30-year-olds are living with their parents than are married and parents themselves. In 2020, only 2.1 million American children were born annually into married families, compared to 3.1 million in the late 1960s, though the population has nearly doubled over that period.
Meanwhile, and relatedly, supporting a family has become more difficult. Middle-class wages have stagnated and costs have risen, so that the essentials of housing, health care, transportation, and education that would have cost a typical earner 30 weeks of income in 1985 now consume more than an entire year’s income. Many families have adjusted by having both parents work, and work more hours, and the steady drumbeat of proposals for subsidized childcare and paid leave aim to universalize that model. But most families would prefer to have a parent staying home with the young kids they have, and financial constraints are the most commonly cited obstacle to having more.
At American Compass, we work to understand the confluence of social, technological, and economic forces undermining family formation and flourishing. We develop policies to counter those forces, with a focus on creating economic conditions in which a typical worker’s income is sufficient to support a family.
The Home Building collection examines the myriad ways that public policy affects family formation and stability, both directly and through its influence on the broader economy and culture. Essays from prominent scholars consider how to define family and frame the public interest in promoting it, which challenges to focus on, and what tools policymakers have at their disposal. A two–part survey of parenting-age Americans provides the often-missing context of their varied circumstances, goals, and policy preferences.
We have focused particular attention on the idea of a “child allowance” or “family benefit.” In early 2021, Senator Mitt Romney proposed the Family Security Act, which would give each family several hundred dollars per month for each of their children. American Compass’s Oren Cass and Wells King offered their own proposal for a Family Income Supplemental Credit (Fisc), which attracted widespread interest from conservative analysts and policymakers who preferred how it targeted support to working families. Cass argued for the advantages of this approach in the New York Times and in an event with Sen. Romney. In 2022, Senators Romney, Richard Burr, and Steve Daines proposed a revised Family Security Act 2.0 that adopted the Fisc’s structure and received widespread praise from conservatives. Senator Josh Hawley has proposed a family benefit that uses the Fisc’s framework as well.
Countless policy tools beyond direct financial support also offer vital buttresses. For instance, the Home Building collection features a brief symposium of Proposals to Make America More Family-Friendly, while A Home Security System highlights the many ways that entitlement programs and employer benefits could better serve homemakers. Often, the tools fall under other headings, for instance as Education, Labor, or Tech policy. Just as policymakers have become adept at viewing almost any question through the lens of economic growth, they must learn to ask how all their choices affect the family.
Public Policy for the American Family
Featured ContentBrowse all content in the Family library
The cost of achieving middle-class security has risen much faster than the typical wage, and now the nation’s fertility rate is plummeting.
This paper focuses on two related areas where public policy places homemakers at a significant disadvantage: access to social insurance systems and employer benefits.
American Compass policy director explores policy options to protect children online with the same vigor that we protect them in the real world.
This paper presents the case for a per-child family benefit that would operate as a form of reciprocal social insurance paid only to working families.
Writers and analysts from across the right-of-center apply a family-focused lens to contemporary policy challenges.
Republicans, Independents, and the working and middle classes respond to the pressures facing working families
A significant opportunity exists for bipartisan cooperation on a permanent, expanded Child Tax Credit that maintains a connection to work.
Across all classes and regardless of parental status, 60 to 75% of Americans say that the government should do more to support families.
American attitudes about family structure vary widely, but most families see a full-time earner and a stay-at-home parent as the ideal arrangement for raising young children.
The American family may have entered a period of crisis, but a rich conservative literature—from political philosophy to sociology to journalism—can help us to better understand the root causes and guide policy reforms to the family’s renewal.
The conflict between responsibilities at home and at work is largely the result of economic transitions to which we still—nearly a century after industrialization and 50 years into the modern feminist movement—have not adequately responded.
The path to a more secure and generous American welfare state lies not in rejecting the work ethic and the distinction it makes between contributory social insurance and non-contributory social assistance, but rather in embracing it.
If conservatives do not speak for the family, who will?
Addressing our fertility and family-formation crises will require us to push the boundaries of family policy and embrace a whole-of-society approach.
A pro-worker agenda must treat families, not individuals, as the basic units of public policy.
Family Financial Security: Senator Mitt Romney on the Right’s Fight to Support Our Most Important Institution
A conversation with Senator Mitt Romney about the future of family benefits in the U.S. and what it means for the right-of-center’s future.
Executive director Oren Cass and Matt Bruenig of the People’s Policy Project join the Solidarity Policy Podcast to debate child benefits, the Romney plan, and more.
The Niskanen Center’s Samuel Hammond and the American Enterprise Institute’s Scott Winship debate the case for a “child allowance.”
But older anti-government institutions still need to realise that the mistakes of the 1960s are not being repeated
Strengthening support for working families is not just a popular priority, but a conservative one.
This is a pivotal moment for the conservative movement, which has finally woken up to the reality that decades of WSJ-style economic policy have been a disaster for working families and thus a disaster for America.
The reformed Child Tax Credit isn’t “welfare”—it’s conservative family policy.
If conservatives want to lead on family policy, they have to be willing to fight for it
American Compass executive director Oren Cass discusses the promising shift on the right-of-center toward supporting generous pro-family benefits like Senator Romney’s Family Security Act 2.0.