Family
Supporting the indispensable institution
Overview
The family is the indispensable institution, the only one capable of producing a next generation and preparing it for the burdens of productive citizenship. Its ongoing collapse poses the greatest threat to American liberty and prosperity.
Beginning in the 1960s, a rising share of children have been born to single mothers and raised in unstable households. More recently, marriage and fertility rates have fallen to the point that more 30-year-olds are living with their parents than are married and parents themselves. In 2020, only 2.1 million American children were born annually into married families, compared to 3.1 million in the late 1960s, though the population has nearly doubled over that period.
Meanwhile, and relatedly, supporting a family has become more difficult. Middle-class wages have stagnated and costs have risen, so that the essentials of housing, health care, transportation, and education that would have cost a typical earner 30 weeks of income in 1985 now consume more than an entire yearās income. Many families have adjusted by having both parents work, and work more hours, and the steady drumbeat of proposals for subsidized childcare and paid leave aim to universalize that model. But most families would prefer to have a parent staying home with the young kids they have, and financial constraints are the most commonly cited obstacle to having more.
At American Compass, we work to understand the confluence of social, technological, and economic forces undermining family formation and flourishing. We develop policies to counter those forces, with a focus on creating economic conditions in which a typical workerās income is sufficient to support a family.
The Home Building collection examines the myriad ways that public policy affects family formation and stability, both directly and through its influence on the broader economy and culture. Essays from prominent scholars consider how to define family and frame the public interest in promoting it, which challenges to focus on, and what tools policymakers have at their disposal. A two–part survey of parenting-age Americans provides the often-missing context of their varied circumstances, goals, and policy preferences.
We have focused particular attention on the idea of a āchild allowanceā or āfamily benefit.ā In early 2021, Senator Mitt Romney proposed the Family Security Act, which would give each family several hundred dollars per month for each of their children. American Compassās Oren Cass and Wells King offered their own proposal for a Family Income Supplemental Credit (Fisc), which attracted widespread interest from conservative analysts and policymakers who preferred how it targeted support to working families. Cass argued for the advantages of this approach in the New York Times and in an event with Sen. Romney. In 2022, Senators Romney, Richard Burr, and Steve Daines proposed a revised Family Security Act 2.0 that adopted the Fiscās structure and received widespread praise from conservatives. Senator Josh Hawley has proposed a family benefit that uses the Fiscās framework as well.
Countless policy tools beyond direct financial support also offer vital buttresses. For instance, the Home Building collection features a brief symposium of Proposals to Make America More Family-Friendly, while A Home Security System highlights the many ways that entitlement programs and employer benefits could better serve homemakers. Often, the tools fall under other headings, for instance as Education, Labor, or Tech policy. Just as policymakers have become adept at viewing almost any question through the lens of economic growth, they must learn to ask how all their choices affect the family.
Start Here
Compass Advisors
