RECOMMENDED READING

We live in a diverse country, where people have a lot of different preferences about how to live. For example, a 2016 Pew Research Center survey found that 59 percent of Americans believed children with two parents were better off if one parent stayed at home, but 39 percent thought children were just as well off if both parents worked.

So which side was right? Well, obviously, neither. It depends on the personality, values and circumstances of the people in each particular family. Despite what Tolstoy wrote, happy families are in fact all happy in their own ways.

Our debates about family structure have been poisoned by people who canā€™t acknowledge difference without immediately rendering some judgment. Family pluralism is a source of strength for this country, not a weakness.

It should be said that peopleā€™s views on what is the ideal family form are powerfully linked to their class standing. As research by scholars at the American Compass think tank has shown, people in the working class and to a lesser extent the middle class are more likely to prefer the ā€œbreadwinnerā€ model, in which one parent stays home, when children are younger than 5. Families making more than $150,000 are more likely to admire the ā€œdual earnerā€ model, in which both parents work.

Continue Reading at The New York Times
Recommended Reading
First, Assume the Can Opener Is Broken

And more from this week…

What Will Trump’s New Economic Policy Look Like? Part 1

Oren joins a panel discussion with Jason Furman, Richard Burkhauser, and Kimberly Clausing about what Trump’s second term’s economic policy.

It Canā€™t Just Be DOGE

Trumpā€™s anti-bureaucracy energy should be directed at regulation as well as waste