Long-term frameworks are necessary to lock in the desired effects of the US administration’s most controversial policies.
RECOMMENDED READING
The Trump administration’s immigration policy has assumed the “will they, won’t they” character of a mediocre romantic comedy, oscillating between aggressive enforcement raids one day and contemplation of widespread amnesty the next. What’s needed, desperately, is long-term commitment.
Its resemblance to the trade agenda is uncanny, in the impressive early successes, the problem of ongoing instability, and the not yet fully realised potential for setting the US on a better economic course. In both cases, what matters most is not swift and harsh retaliation for past wrongs, but clarity for the future — initiating investments today that will yield returns for years to come.
These challenges are more apparent in the trade context. The surprise at how quickly President Donald Trump imposed stiff tariffs even on close allies has been exceeded only by surprise at their early success and limited downside. Economists lectured that tariffs would only strengthen the dollar, negating their own effect. The dollar has weakened. Consumers will pay the price, they said. Few price increases have reached consumers at all. The EU and Canada have caved on their digital services tax. Mexico is pushing China out of its supply chains. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company is shifting capital out of Japan and into the US.
Recommended Reading
Trade Agreements Must Put Workers First
Of all the technical flaws in the badly broken international trade system, the one most intuitive to the layman is the race to the bottom on labor. In the global Read more…
Reviving the Conservative Heart of Organized Labor
Cardus’s Brian Dijkema advocates for a new conservative home for organized labor in this adaptation from American Compass’s “A Seat at the Table” series.
Worker Power, Loose Borders: Pick One
A funny thing happened in the days after we published “What Happened: The Trump Presidency in Review.” The collection’s emphasis on the success of economic policies that pushed the labor market toward full employment attracted substantial interest from proponents of looser fiscal and monetary policy. But that “strange new respect” came with the mandatory caveat that we were still wrong to suggest increased immigration enforcement and a slower inflow of new workers might be part of the same package.
