RECOMMENDED READING
Republicans Are Misremembering Their Record of ‘Fiscal Discipline’
New Collection: Supply-Side Economics Beyond Tax Cuts
The Curse of Voodoo Economics

Once upon a time, a conservative must have greatly offended a powerful sorcerer. How else to explain the curse afflicting American politics, which condemns each generation to toil anew under the mistaken belief that fighting poverty is merely a matter of sending money to the poor? Twenty-five years after welfare reform, we seem to be back where we started, with Democrats crowing that the $1.9 trillion Covid-19 relief bill, which sends cash to every family for each of their children, will “cut child poverty in half.”

Perhaps, as a matter of government statistical reporting, child poverty will plunge in 2021. Give people cash, count it as income that lifts them above the poverty line, and—voilà—poverty “solved.” Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society similarly reduced the poverty rate for households with children from 16 percent in 1965 to 11 percent in 1969. Unfortunately, even as anti-poverty spending proceeded to triple from 1970 to 1995, the poverty rate for households with children stubbornly climbed back to 16 percent.

What went wrong? By one measure, the flood of resources accomplished its goal: the poverty rate for households headed by a single mother dropped from 52 percent in 1965 to 45 percent in 1969 and then fell a bit further, to 42 percent by 1995. But at the same time, the number of single-mother households exploded.

Continue Reading at City Journal
Oren Cass
Oren Cass is the executive director at American Compass.
@oren_cass
Recommended Reading
Republicans Are Misremembering Their Record of ‘Fiscal Discipline’

If conservatism is to regain its footing, the New Right will need better solutions than what Trump has offered. But a return to what came before him is no solution at all.

New Collection: Supply-Side Economics Beyond Tax Cuts

Long-term analysis shows the ineffectiveness of the Bush and Trump tax cuts

The Curse of Voodoo Economics

Conservatives should favor limited government, not reflexive tax cuts