RECOMMENDED READING
Are we the passive victims of rapacious technology? Or fully knowledgeable about how technology works and in control of its role in our lives?
Thatâs a central tension of many of todayâs tech policy debates, including the âLost in the Super Marketâ essays: if data-driven services, sticky online content, and digital labor markets are surreptitiously exploiting consumersâ and workersâ interestsâor if people are instead making sophisticated tradeoffs and using tech to take firmer control of their lives.
In other words: Are we humans working for technologyâor is technology working for us?
The former argument reflects an overly dim view of consumers. When I agree to share my location with Waze, Iâm aware that Iâm giving something (my location) in order to get something (aggregated traffic data)âeven if I donât know how it all works under the hood.
At the same time, the latter vision of knowledgeable consumers with full agency requires the consumer to do a lot of work and check the fine print. While the techno-pessimistic view can be paternalistic, people are quite busy, and some unscrupulous companies have violated our trust.
Thereâs a middle ground here, and to extend Oren Cassâs analogy, the modern supermarket shows what it could look like: strengthening consumersâ power by helping them become smarter shoppers. For example:
- Just as supermarket coupons help shoppers get the best price on a product, the browser extension Honey easily finds online coupons, and services like Trim automatically negotiate savings in your monthly bills.
- Just as food nutrition labels help shoppers eat more responsibly, app permissions in iOS and Android tell you what types of data are being collected.
- Just as supermarket shelves label discounts and 2-for-1 deals, Uber and Lyftâs driver apps clearly illustrate driversâ past and potential earnings and the best spots for passenger demand.
- Just as supermarkets offer store-branded goods at a cheaper price than premium brands, Amazonâs Basics branded goods help budget-conscious shoppers save money.
- Just as supermarket loyalty cards track your purchases in order to target discounts and promotions, Facebook and Googleâs ad networks observe your interests in order to target a relevant adâand let you pause or deactivate that targeting.
These companiesâ tools give consumers more information and control. By contrast, regulation typically moves too slowly or ineffectually to solve peopleâs frustrations with technology. Europeâs much-mocked âcookie directiveâ requires Internet users to click an âacceptâ button so ubiquitous that itâs rendered meaningless.
Of course, neither in supermarkets nor in technology does merely providing greater choice and transparency ensure better outcomes. We have both record obesity rates and ample stories of tech abuses and excesses to prove that.
But ultimately, the best way to make tech work for people is smarter, more human-centric product design. Or to use a different comparison, tech should borrow from urban planning.
Urban planners define a social goal and then design a city to encourage that goal. Planners want in-person interaction, so they build town squares. Planners want healthy and local eating, so they create farmersâ markets. Planners want families to raise their kids nearby, so they build parks.
Tech services are starting to do the same. Twitter wants to discourage thoughtless retweets, so itâs using a âwant to read the article first?â prompt when you try to share an article you havenât read. Instagram wants to encourage warm feelings, so it tested removing âlikes.â Parents want their kids to put down their iPads and go outside, so Apple built screen time controls.
This kind of thoughtful design also borrows from supermarkets: store layouts are designed to help busy shoppers quickly grab a rotisserie chicken or prepackaged dinner near the store entrance. Many small nudges can add up to meaningful behavioral change.
Urban planners have spent decades defining the kind of social behaviors they want to encourage in a city, but the tech industry is just starting that conversation. How do we design technology to encourage people to be more considerate, more responsible, more understanding, more information-literate? Thatâs next on the tech industryâs to-do list.
While that happens, itâs also partly on us to keep our technology human-centered. Several years ago, a friend told me that his teenage daughter became tired of attending parties where everyone was on their phone, so she organized a phone-free party. That kind of initiative and humanity canât come from product design alone.
We arenât victims of technology any more than a supermarketâs cardboard display of Oreos forces us to buy them. But industry should take seriously the challenge of giving people clearer information, better tools, and more control to make sure technology continues to work for them.
Recommended Reading
Five Principles of Tech Governance
The time has come to take stock of the Information Era and to govern it.
Selling the Digital Soul
The use and abuse of personal data pose a collective challenge that cannot be solved by individuals.
Big Tech, Antitrust and America’s Future
Wednesdayâs âmust watchâ House Judiciary hearing with the CEOs of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google raised a host of questions, including what the goal of antitrust should be (maximizing economic welfare or other goals, like protecting small business), and how should we think about platform industries.